Completed DGE protocol: Post-SPIA Modification I and II, purification using AMPure beads. Did this in the molecular lab to prevent cDNA contamination of future DGE samples.
Meeting with JH.
VCF files - reporting positions with single nucleotide and missing data (“./.”) as SNPs
Incorporating comments from co-authors
Hadley Wickham
tidyr
dplyr
group_by
%>%
browseVignettes(package = "dplyr")
fill.brush
to select points, highlight in other chartsCode from presentation on github
Completed DGE protocol: Post-SPIA Modification I and II, purification using AMPure beads. Did this in the molecular lab to prevent cDNA contamination of future DGE samples.
Qubit results:
Samples | ng/ul |
---|---|
01-B-HS | 9.03 |
02-A-HS | 9.22 |
02-C-HS | 10.7 |
04-A-HS | >60 |
Update 2014-08-06: re-ran 04-A-HS at 10x dilution (0.2ul in 1.8ul H2O).
Samples | ng/ul | stock (ng/ul) |
---|---|---|
04-A-HS | 5.83 | 58 |
Edits to manuscript
Qubit RNA assay for sample extracted with RNAzol
Sample | ng/ul |
---|---|
04-A-CO | <20 |
O5-B-CO | 37.6 |
10-A-CO | <20 |
1O-B-CO | 45.0 |
12-A-CO | <20 |
22-A-CO | <20 |
22-B-CO | 4.4 |
22-C-CO | <20 |
Also checked RNA concentration of the DGE preps
Sample | ng/ul |
---|---|
02-C-HS | 2.4 |
04-A-HS | 9.9 |
Emailed Ashesh at Nugen to ask about DGE protocol.
How much RNA was used as input into the system? How was the RNA isolated? What is the RNA quality (RIN, 260/280 and 260/230 ratio)? How was the amplified cDNA purified and what was the elution volume? The reason that I am asking is that we would expect ug quantities of cDNA. Your concentration of > 9 ng/ul seems to be low. Did you do bioanalyzer analysis on the amplified cDNA? Can you send me the traces?
It is good to hear from you. I have a few questions about the cDNA amplification. How much RNA was used as input into the system? How was the RNA isolated? What is the RNA quality (RIN, 260/280 and 260/230 ratio)? How was the amplified cDNA purified and what was the elution volume? The reason that I am asking is that we would expect ug quantities of cDNA. Your concentration of > 9 ng/ul seems to be low. Did you do bioanalyzer analysis on the amplified cDNA? Can you send me the traces?
To answer your questions; while this system uses poly(A) priming you may see some rRNA read. This is because rRNA sequences can have poly(A) stretches that may be primed and amplified. This is also organism dependent since we see higher rRNA when using C. elegans total RNA compared to human total RNA. You will see these sequences in your library but it should be a small percent of the total number of reads. Secondly, library construction requires the presence of double-stranded DNA so the presence of RNA should not interfere with the library construction.
Are you doing paired-end or single end reads? For sequencing 100bp reads, I would recommending fragmenting the cDNA to 200 bp. The cDNA should be purified after fragmentation. When using the Rapid library system, I would recommend using 1ug of the fragmented cDNA as input into the system. Additionally, I would like to remind you that a qPCR library quantification is required to accurately quantify the libraries produced with the Rapid system.
So…the SPIA amplification doesn’t seem to be working to expectations…
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.